Understanding short and thin implants
Traditional implants typically require a substantial amount of bone, which is not always available in patients with bone loss or anatomical constraints.- Short implants are designed for areas with anatomical limitations like a drooping sinus floor with less residual bone height or proximity to vital anatomical structures like nerves.
- Thin implants are designed to offer alternatives in situations where bone density or mesiodistal space is limited, or in areas of poor bone width.
What are short implants?
Short implants are characterized by their reduced length, typically less than 10 mm. These implants are particularly useful in cases where there is insufficient bone height, especially in the posterior areas of the jaw. Because they don't require extensive bone augmentation, they often present a less invasive option for patients. Indications for Short Implants: Short implants can be used in almost all types of replacements whether fixed or removable including:- Single and multiple fixed prosthesis in posterior jaw
- Type 1 and Type II bone.
- In the treatment of a severely resorbed edentulous mandible, with four short-length implants used to support an overdenture or six short implants used to support a fixed prosthesis.
- In edentulous maxilla, two short-length implants are additionally placed in the distal area, together with longer implants in the premaxilla to support a maxillary overdenture or a fixed prosthesis.
What are thin implants?
Thin implants, also known as narrow-diameter implants (NDI), are generally less than 3.5 mm in width. They are often considered for scenarios involving limited bone width or for patients who cannot undergo complex reconstructive and grafting procedures. These implants are frequently used for specific cases such as in the lower front teeth or with minimal bone availability mesiodistally.- Category 1: Implants with a diameter of <2.5 mm (“Mini-implants”)
- Category 2: Implants with a diameter of 2.5 mm to <3.3 mm
- Category 3: Implants with a diameter of 3.3 mm to 3.5 mm
- Support of definitive complete mandibular overdentures
- Support of interim prostheses, both fixed and removable
- Support of definitive complete mandibular overdentures
- Support of single tooth replacement in the anterior zone with narrow interdental width (maxillary lateral incisors and single mandibular incisors)
- Support of definitive complete overdentures
- Support of single tooth replacement in sites with reduced interdental and/or buccal-lingual width
- Support of multiple unit restorations
Design considerations
The design of short and thin implants plays a crucial role in their success. Here are some key design factors:Short implants
- Thread design: Optimizing the thread pattern enhances primary stability and maximizes bone-to-implant contact. A deeper thread may provide better anchorage. Increasing the number of threads and a square thread design has a higher bone-implant contact percent.
- Implant shape: A tapered design can help in achieving better stability, particularly in soft bone.
- Surface treatment: Advanced surface coatings and textures can encourage osseointegration, improving the long-term stability of the implant.
- Width considerations: Choosing a wider diameter of implant with the short length results in lesser prosthetic failures. Most standard implant companies provide short implants with wide diameter only.
Thin implants
- Material selection: Using strong materials like titanium-zirconium alloy can compensate for the reduced diameter, ensuring the implant can withstand necessary occlusal forces.
- Length considerations: Slightly longer thin implants can help distribute loads more effectively and provide additional stability.
- Platform switching: Utilizing platform switching can reduce bone loss around the implant by altering stress distribution patterns.
Surgical considerations
Short implants
- Two step surgical protocol: A two stage surgery is advocated for short implants as it provides good primary stability during healing phase. The time elapsed between the surgical and load stage should be 4-6 months for maxilla and 2-4 months for mandible.
- Adapted surgical protocol: Enhanced initial implant stability can be achieved by eliminating a step in standard surgical protocol such as eliminating the countersink drill or eliminating the final drill in the standard drilling sequence. Soft bone drilling protocol should be followed in poor quality bone whereas, the final bone drilling is done with narrow drills rather than standard size drills.
Thin implants
- Gentle and atraumatic approach: Proper surgical technique is crucial to preserve the surrounding bone and soft tissue. This includes using sharp drills with adequate, intermittent irrigation to prevent bone overheating, which can compromise osseointegration.
- Undersized osteotomy: The initial osteotomy is often made slightly narrower than the final implant to allow the implant to self-tap and achieve high primary stability upon insertion.
- Apical and bicortical engagement: For maximum stability, especially in areas with lower bone density, apical engagement in dense bone and bicortical fixation (engaging both the buccal and lingual cortical plates) are often targeted.
- Ridge splitting: For knife-edge ridges that are too narrow for implant placement, a ridge-splitting technique may have to be additionally performed. This involves creating a mid-crestal osteotomy to expand the ridge and allow for the simultaneous placement of the thin implant.
Free for members
Keep reading — it's free
The rest of this article is open to DentalReach members. Create a free account, or sign in, and every article on the site opens in full.