Objectives
The primary objective of this review was to meticulously assess how effective S-PRG filler-containing topical applications are at preserving the integrity of dental hard tissues. Given the rising interest in minimally invasive dentistry and preventive oral care, understanding the impact of such materials could significantly influence future clinical practices.Data Sources
To ensure a comprehensive analysis, an extensive literature search was conducted across several databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, Lilacs, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up until August 15, 2022. Efforts were also made to include grey literature through searches in Google and Open Grey, supplemented by handsearching techniques.Study Selection
The selection process focused on identifying clinical and in vitro studies that examined the effects of S-PRG filler-containing applications on adult human teeth. Out of 2,488 initial results, 33 studies met the inclusion criteria after duplicate removal and title/abstract screening. Ultimately, 11 studies passed full-text screening based on predetermined eligibility criteria.Results
Among the eligible studies, nine were conducted in vitro while two were non-randomised clinical trials. The studies varied in terms of S-PRG filler delivery methods which included toothpastes, polishing pastes, eluates as delivery methods, and coatings. These applications were tested against enamel demineralization, dentine preservation, or oral biofilm management. Despite observed heterogeneity among study designs and outcomes leading to an inability for meta-analysis execution; individually analyzed data revealed promising results towards inhibiting demineralization in a dose-dependent manner alongside antimicrobial properties against cariogenic species.Free for members
Keep reading — it's free
The rest of this article is open to DentalReach members. Create a free account, or sign in, and every article on the site opens in full.